EMIRATES AIR SWIMS IN TROUBLE WATER OVER N8.1M DEBT
Inbox
| x |
|
Wed, Dec 4, 1:50 PM (3 days ago)
|
| |||
The order was sequel to a
motion filed by Dr Charles Mekwunye seeking for the enforcement of a
Supreme Court judgment in a suit between Promise Mekwunye and the
airline.
Granting
the reliefs sought by Mekwunye, Justice Mohammed Liman, held, “It is
accordingly ordered that an attachment is hereby issued on the judgment
debtor’s aircraft registered as ‘A6 Aircraft Type 77W EK: 783/784’, or
any other aircraft belonging to the judgment debtor which flies into
Nigeria Territory, to be arrested and detained until the judgment debt
is fully paid: in default after 30 days, the aircraft shall be auctioned
to satisfy the judgment debt.”
The judge also ordered that Emirates Airline shall bear the cost of maintainance and custody of the detained aircraft.
Miss
Mekwunye who was then a student of North Texas University, Denton,
Texas USA had in 2008 dragged the airline to court for refusal of
boarding of her two-way flight ticket from Dallas to Nigeria and back
for no reason and for further refusing to fully refund the cost of the
ticket of American Airline she bought to come back to Nigeria.
She claimed that the airline offered no reason for its action leaving her stranded for days at the airport until she was able to secure a more expensive flight ticket on a longer route to Lagos.
She claimed that the airline offered no reason for its action leaving her stranded for days at the airport until she was able to secure a more expensive flight ticket on a longer route to Lagos.
In
a judgment delivered on November 15, 2010, the Federal High Court held
that the refusal of Emirates Airline to carry Mekwunye amounted to a
breach of contract of carriage.
Consequently,
the court ordered full refund of ticket without any deduction or
charge, and further granted N2.5 million in general damages and N250,000
in legal costs against the airline.
Emirates appealed the judgment and contended that the trial Judge erred in law when he awarded N250,000 in legal fees when the plaintiff claimed N1 million but led no evidence.
The airline contended that the award of general damages was contrary to the Montreal Convention which not only limits the damages recoverable but placed obligation to prove wilful misconduct /gross negligence against the airline before the airline can be liable for damages.
Emirates appealed the judgment and contended that the trial Judge erred in law when he awarded N250,000 in legal fees when the plaintiff claimed N1 million but led no evidence.
The airline contended that the award of general damages was contrary to the Montreal Convention which not only limits the damages recoverable but placed obligation to prove wilful misconduct /gross negligence against the airline before the airline can be liable for damages.
On
April 11, 2014, the Court of Appeal upheld the airlines appeal and
upturned the award of N250,000 and N2.5million earlier awarded to Miss
Mekwunye.
The matter later moved to the Supreme Court and in a lead judgement delivered on February 1, 2019, by Justice Ejembi Eko, the apex court overruled the decision of the Court of Appeal and upheld the earlier judgment of Federal High Court.
The matter later moved to the Supreme Court and in a lead judgement delivered on February 1, 2019, by Justice Ejembi Eko, the apex court overruled the decision of the Court of Appeal and upheld the earlier judgment of Federal High Court.
The
apex court held that the trial court was right in ordering Emirates
Airline to pay in the circumstances N2.5million as general damages in
addition to ticket refund as the airline cannot rely on the Montreal
Convention for limitation of liability when it was guilty of fundamental
breach of the contract as argued by the appellant’s lawyer Dr.
Mekwunye.
The
Supreme Court further held amongst other things that the Court of
Appeal was wrong to have heard and upturned the decision of the lower
court when Emirate Airline never obtain leave of court to file the
appeal as to costs.
The apex court also held that the airline’s denial of boarding was a repudiation of its contract with Mekwunye and a breach of the fundamental term of the contract which does not entitle it to rely on the Montreal Convention which sets limit of claims in an action between an airline and it passenger.
The
judgment debt plus interest has since accumulated to about N8.1 million
as Emirates airlines refuses to comply with the judgementThe apex court also held that the airline’s denial of boarding was a repudiation of its contract with Mekwunye and a breach of the fundamental term of the contract which does not entitle it to rely on the Montreal Convention which sets limit of claims in an action between an airline and it passenger.
No comments:
Post a Comment